Big question

BQ11 - How do we embed and maximise a sustainable circular economy within the water sector by 2050?

Route
map
Case
Studies

 

We are currently working on the approach to answering this Big Question, and more information will be given here soon.

The areas that this Big Question covers includes:

  • Evaluate if we are contributing harmful plastics to the water cycle
  • Establish their source and effective control measures to remove them

Once we understand where the gaps are, we will produce a route map – this is a plan as to how we will answer our Big Question.

The route map will have a number of key elements. At the top will be our Big Question and then we will look to see what Outcomes we need from the research programme -if we can achieve all these outcomes we can answer the Big Question. This is the stage we are currently at for this Big Question.

The next stage will be to think about the key benefits we want the research projects to deliver to meet these outcomes.

Following this, we will plan the research projects to help deliver the benefits.

UKWIR – the UK and Irish water industry’s research body – has commissioned the first study of its kind in the UK to develop a robust approach to sampling and detection of microplastic particles in the treated water cycle. This included accurately measuring the presence of microplastic particles in potable (drinking) water, treated wastewater and in the solid residues (sludge) produced by both the water and wastewater treatment processes. Please click here to view more information.

RESEARCH Outcomes








See All Projects  

Projects


 

What does a circular economy water industry look like? (BQ11 Pathfinder Project).

Project Status - Project Completed


 

Where is the greatest sustainable economic benefit for resource recovery in the water cycle?.

Project Status - Project Completed


 

Potential impacts of PFAS in biosolids upon environmental and human health.

Project Status - Expressions of Interest

Category - Sludge & Waste Management

​Investigations through UKWIR, including the Chemicals Investigation Programme (CIP), have demonstrated the presence of PFAS in biosolids. Currently, there is a lack of biosolid specific information for PFAS impacts upon environmental and human health. This further adds to the risk that the practice of recycling biosolids to agricultural land will be stopped, particularly due to the presence/perception of contaminants it contains and the potential harm to human and environmental health of utilising it on farmland. The UK water industry currently has no viable alternative outlet for biosolids, maintaining a safe agricultural outlet is therefore vital.


Further investigation is required to understand the specific long-term risks from the PFAS content in biosolids when used in agriculture and determine an industry agreed safe level for both human and environmental health.


Although ongoing and future approved UKWIR projects through to AMP8 will increase our understanding of PFAS content in biosolids, the knowledge gaps highlighted above still exist.


 

Risk-assessing impacts of trade effluent and tankered waste on biosolids.

Project Status - Expressions of Interest

A risk exists that recycling of biosolids to agricultural land will be stopped, due to the presence/perception of the contaminants it contains and the potential harm to human and environmental health of utilising it on farmland. The water industry currently has no viable alternative outlet for biosolids and therefore maintaining a safe agricultural outlet is vital. One of the biggest concerns raised by NGOs is the perceived lack of control over inputs to biosolids spread on agricultural land.


Emerging contaminants of concern may be present in biosolids at various concentration levels that do not yet have a regulatory limit, for example microplastics and PFAS. Limits are emerging globally for some of these substances in biosolids recycled to agriculture and it is possible that similar limits will be introduced in the UK. Previous research has highlighted that existing capability across the UK water sector to risk-assess the impact of specific trade effluent (TE)* and tankered waste (TW)** could have on the concentration of such substances in biosolids is limited. A need therefore exists for WaSCs to develop the capability to identify specific types of TE and TW that represent the highest risk for specific substances in biosolids and enable prioritisation of upstream TE and TW controls and monitoring resources accordingly. Developing this capability in advance of any changes to regulatory limits in biosolids, would place WaSCs in a position to respond quickly. 


* Trade effluent – any liquid waste that is produced from a process or activity undertaken at premises that are used to carry out a trade or industry and is discharged into public sewers.

** Tankered waste - liquid wastes which, for one reason or another, cannot be accommodated through a sewer network. The wastes accepted are those derived from industry and trade; landfill leachates; strong organic wastes; and even hazardous wastes. Typically delivered to site via a tanker.



RESEARCH IMPACT - CASE STUDIES